2–9 Sep 2026

1–23 June 2026

·

Meta + YouTube

Meta + Google/YouTube

·

One week

Three weeks

One Film. 96,060

One Film. 4,037,728

One Film. 4,037,728

Meta accounts reached · 157,590 ad impressions

moments of attention, 1,097,946 people reached

moments of attention, 1,097,946 people reached

The film provided a visual route into research on pregnancy and disease in Malawi. Viewing on both television and mobile shows that the animation was encountered in several screen settings.

Your paper took years. Most of the world will never read it. Here’s what happens when the research becomes a film, and the film gets promoted properly.

Your paper took years. Most of the world will never read it. Here’s what happens when the research becomes a film, and the film gets promoted properly.

The research:

Pregnancy and disease in Malawi

Elovanoid neuroprotection targets cell transcriptomics and proteomics to sustain synaptic integrity after brain injury

The film and its home online:

From a published paper to 96,060 people reached. This is what we built for Dr Jack.

From a published paper to 1,097,946 people. This is what we built for Dr. Nicolas Bazan.

164,006

4,095,195

4,095,195

total impressions across Meta and YouTube

total impressions across
Meta and Google/YouTube

96,060

1,097,946

1,097,946

unique accounts reached on Meta

unique accounts reached
on Meta

1,343

5,620

5,620

YouTube promotion views

people who chose to
watch the film on YouTube

44.3%

86%

86%

of YouTube watch time on connected TV

of YouTube views happened
on a connected TV screen

114

~7,419

~7,419

LinkedIn impressions during the campaign window

impressions every hour,
day and night, for three weeks

1.64

x4

x4

average times each reached account saw the film

The average person reached
saw the film nearly four times

Seen at scale

Your research reached 96,060 people.

Your research reached
1,097,946 people.

The film provided a visual route into research on pregnancy and disease in Malawi. Viewing on both television and mobile shows that the animation was encountered in several screen settings.

Meta delivered broad awareness at scale while Google/YouTube generated direct traffic at very low cost. Together they formed a complementary media mix — not a platform competition.

Meta Ads

· 157.6K impressions

· 4.04M impressions

YouTube

Google/YouTube

· 6.4K impressions

· 57K impressions

2 channels, 1 campaign

Two channels, one campaign

Awareness at scale and viewing on YouTube.

Awareness at scale and
traffic at low-cost.

Each platform was optimised for a different outcome. Meta maximised visibility through reach; YouTube extended viewing beyond the social feed.

Each platform was optimised for a different outcome. Meta maximised visibility through reach; Google/YouTube tested low-cost traffic response.

Meta Ads

Meta impressions

157,590

4,037,728

Accounts reached

96,060

1,097,946

Avg. frequency

1.64

~3.68

YouTube
Google / YouTube

YouTube impressions

6,416

57,467

Promotion views

Likes

1,343

55

Role

Viewing

Traffic

Where it landed

44.3% of YouTube watch time was on TV.

85.7% of Meta reach
was on Android.

YouTube viewing was led by connected TV, with mobile phone as the next surface. Tablet and computer made up the remainder.

Almost all Meta delivery landed on mobile phones. Android carried the audience; iPhone was secondary. Tablets and desktop were negligible.

Watch-time share by device
Reach share by device
44.3%
85.7%

TV

Android

TV 44.3%

Android 85.7%

Mobile 38.4%

iPhone 13.4%

Other 17.3%

Other devices 0.9%

TV + phone share
Mobile share of reach
82.7%
99.1%

TV + phone

Phones

TV + mobile 82.7%

Android + iPhone 99.1%

Tablet / computer 17.3%

Tablet / desktop / other 0.9%

Share of YouTube watch time

Share of Meta reach

Device

Views

Share

Watch hours

TV

Android

1,211

44.3%

14.4h

Mobile phone

1,404

38.4%

12.5h

Tablet

269

6.9%

2.2h

Computer

410

10.4%

3.4h

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

—

100%

164,006

The standout finding

TV and mobile contributed 44.3% and 38.4% of YouTube watch time.

Meta drove scale.
Google drove traffic.

44.3%

98.6%

of YouTube watch time happened on connected TV

of combined impressions came from Meta Ads

of combined impressions came from Meta Ads

TV 44.3% · Mobile 38.4%

Meta 98.6% · Google 1.4%

TV and mobile contributed 44.3% and 38.4% of YouTube watch time. Earlier average viewing was 82.0%.

Meta carried nearly all visibility while Google/YouTube delivered 55 clicks. Both campaigns were economical within their own objective frameworks — one for awareness, one for traffic.

TV

Meta

44.3%

98.6%

Mobile

Google

38.4%

1.4%

Why it’s worth doing

More than a citation count.

More than a citation count.

More than a citation count.

The film provided a visual route into research on pregnancy and disease in Malawi. Viewing on both television and mobile shows that the animation was encountered in several screen settings.

A research article is read in full by a small number of people, most of them already in your field. We turn it into a short film a non-specialist follows, then put it in front of an audience at the scale your field and funders notice.

Across Meta and YouTube the campaign created 164,006 impressions with a measured LinkedIn footprint of 114 impressions. Meta boost reporting

Meta served as the top-of-funnel awareness engine. Google/YouTube played a narrower role moving a smaller audience toward engagement. Framed as complementary channels, the mix is strategically coherent.

What you receive

Everything you need to
make your research travel.

Everything you need to
make your research travel.

The film

A short animated film built faithfully from your published research.

Web page and feature

A dedicated page and a written piece that make the work accessible to non-specialists.

The campaign

Meta and YouTube: 2–9 Sep 2026

Three weeks across Meta Ads and Google/YouTube in-stream video.

Impact report

A citable record: reach, impressions, spend, views and channel roles.

A citable record: reach, impressions, spend, clicks and channel roles.

Explore the film

Get in touch

Watch the Malawi animation to explore the research on pregnancy and disease.

Send us the paper you’d
most like the world to see.

Malawi — Pregnancy and disease in Malawi. Watch the Malawi animation to explore the research on pregnancy and disease.

We’ll come back to you on whether it suits a film and what reaching the right audience would involve. You send us the paper and around an hour of your time, we handle the rest, and most films are built in roughly eight weeks.

We’ll come back to you on whether it suits a film and what reaching the right audience would involve. You send us the paper and around an hour of your time, we handle the rest, and most films are built in roughly eight weeks.

animarastudios.com · info@animarastudios.com

Campaign Data — Source Reference

Metric

Value

Total impressions (Meta + YouTube)

Total impressions (Meta + Google/YouTube)

164,006

4,095,195

Meta reach / impressions

96,060 / 157,590

1,097,946 / 4,037,728

Meta average frequency

1.64

~3.68

YouTube impressions / views

Google/YouTube impressions / clicks

6,416 / 1,343

57,467 / 55

Impression share

Meta 96.1% · YouTube 3.9%

Meta 98.6% · Google/YouTube 1.4%

Surfaces used

Meta Ads, YouTube

Meta Ads, Google/YouTube in-stream

Campaign window

Meta and YouTube: 2–9 Sep 2026

1–23 June 2026

Budget

Impressions per hour

Budget £50.00 · Reported £48.53 · Balance £1.47

~7,419

Primary Meta KPI

Reach

YouTube watch time on TV

YouTube views on connected TV

44.3%

86%

Mobile share of YT watch

Android share of Meta reach

38.4%

85.7%

TV + mobile share

Mobile share of Meta reach

82.7%

99.1%

Facebook views

People who watched on YouTube

156,117

5,620

LinkedIn impressions

Average frequency

114

x4

Research

Malawi — Dr Jack

Elovanoid — Dr. Nicolas Bazan